Privacy

Signal vs WhatsApp vs Telegram: Which Messaging App Is Actually Secure?

Not all encrypted messaging apps offer the same level of privacy. Compare Signal, WhatsApp, and Telegram's security features, data collection, and encryption.

Raimundo Coelho
Raimundo CoelhoCybersecurity Specialist
February 10, 2026
3 min read
Signal vs WhatsApp vs Telegram: Which Messaging App Is Actually Secure?

Why Your Messaging App Choice Matters

We share some of our most personal information through messaging apps — conversations, photos, locations, financial details, and intimate moments. The security and privacy of your messaging app determines who else might be reading along.

Not all messaging apps are created equal. Even those claiming "encryption" vary widely in what they actually protect.

Signal: The Gold Standard

Encryption: End-to-end encryption for all messages, calls, and media by default using the Signal Protocol.

Data collection: Minimal. Signal only stores your phone number and the date you last connected. No message content, contacts, or usage data.

Open source: Fully open source — both the client and server code are publicly auditable.

Pros:

  • Strongest privacy guarantees of any mainstream messenger
  • Disappearing messages with customizable timers
  • No ads, no tracking, no data mining
  • Run by a nonprofit foundation

Cons:

  • Requires a phone number to register
  • Smaller user base means fewer contacts available
  • No cloud backup (by design, for security)

WhatsApp: Encrypted but Owned by Meta

Encryption: Uses the Signal Protocol for end-to-end encryption. Message content is protected.

Data collection: This is where it gets complicated. While message content is encrypted, WhatsApp collects extensive metadata — who you talk to, when, how often, your location, device information, and contact list. This metadata is shared with Meta (Facebook).

Pros:

  • Massive user base (2+ billion users)
  • End-to-end encrypted messages
  • Feature-rich with business integrations

Cons:

  • Owned by Meta — metadata feeds the advertising empire
  • Closed source server code
  • Cloud backups may not be encrypted by default
  • Business accounts can read your messages

Telegram: Not as Secure as You Think

Encryption: Regular chats are NOT end-to-end encrypted. Only "Secret Chats" use end-to-end encryption. Group chats and channels are never end-to-end encrypted.

Data collection: Stores messages on their servers in readable form (for non-secret chats). This means Telegram can read your messages and may be compelled to share them.

Pros:

  • Feature-rich with large groups, channels, and bots
  • Cross-device sync (because messages are on servers)
  • Large file sharing support

Cons:

  • Default chats are not end-to-end encrypted
  • Custom encryption protocol (MTProto) instead of industry-standard Signal Protocol
  • Closed source server code
  • Messages stored on Telegram's servers

Our Recommendation

For maximum privacy: Signal is the clear winner. It offers the strongest encryption, collects the least data, and is fully transparent about its operations.

For everyday convenience with reasonable security: WhatsApp provides good message encryption but compromises on metadata privacy.

Telegram should not be considered a secure messenger unless you exclusively use Secret Chats. Its strength is in features and large communities, not privacy.

Whatever you choose, combine it with a strong account password and two-factor authentication for the most protection.

privacymessagingencryption
Raimundo Coelho
Written by

Raimundo Coelho

Cybersecurity specialist and technology professor with over 20 years of experience in IT. Graduated from Universidade Estácio de Sá. Writing practical guides to help you protect your data and stay safe in the digital world.

You might also like